If you switch the issue view from tab to expand collapse you will gain about five seconds...
FYI, their is a cumulative patch for performance (Cumulative patch for FootPrints Service Core 11.1 - http://tinyurl.com/cvutpe4)
We are sorry to hear about your performance issues after upgrading. Performance is often a consequence of many factors depending on how you are using FootPrints, and the way those features and functions work may have changed. We recommend customers experiencing these types of issues to review and apply the patch available in this Knowledge Base article.
If you continue to experience performance issues our technical support staff would be happy to address them further with you by calling us at 800-836-2326
FootPrints Product Manager
Thank you Kam and Jean for your replies. I am going to apply the Cumulative patch but I have a question. The instructions say to "Save the patch file to the footprints "base" install folder on the server (i.e. C:\Footprints)" However the download is one zip file with 3 folders inside. I placed patch_Cumulative_patch_for_11_1_R9.pm.zip on C:\Footprints and launched MRPatch.bat but received an error.
How do I run this patch?
I installed the Cumulative patch for FP Service Core 11.1 last night. My intitial tests show minor improvements from 13 to 8-10 seconds but we need to do better than 10 seconds to open a webpage. (Moving from Tabbed to Expand/Collapse did gain seconds. Great tip Jean!) Also when I run Footprints Server Benchmark test, the results still average 31 seconds to execute which is defined as slow.
I would love to hear the infrastructure set up of someone acheiving page load times around 5 seconds. We are a small shop with 7 heavy FP users so we are not going to be able to set up massive servers. We using Citrix XEN servers. Does anyone else use VM successfully?
Thank you in advance for your help with this frustating problem.
I have seen the same problem as well. We have been with FootPrints for a good bit (6 years+) when they were with Unipress, Numara and now BMC. We are a nationwide organization with the FP server in our corporate location (PA). We have various users/workspaces in FootPrints (100+ agents). Our performance issues only occur when the users are NOT in the same building where the server is located. So our centers 10-15 miles away have significant issues with open/editing tickets. We have opened up tickets with the Numara and they are convinced it is a network issue on our end. It could very well be that problem but I also wonder how many organizations out there use FootPrints spread across various states like we do.
Based on your description of your performance issues occurring primarily for those not in the building with the server, there could be some network issues. Over time, we have attempted to improve the caching (storing some information on the client/web browser side) and compression (reducing the size of the information passed over the network) of the FootPrints files to reduce what is passed over the network. Depending on when your web server was last configured, you may not be taking full advantage of caching and compression.
You don't say whether you are using a Windows server or a Linux server. In either case, we might be able to help you use MRConfigIIS.pl to reconfigure your web server for IIS on Windows or help you edit your Apache configuration file for Linux (instructions for this are in README.webserver).
You should contact FootPrints Technical Support if you need help.
not sure if this performance problem was eventually solved.
We noticed recently that our CPU on a test FP v11 system was spiking at above 90% throughout mainly by sqlserver . We ran some acitivty monitoring on sql server and realised a lot expensive queries related to exec dashboard stuff . We then stopped the tomcat service (used for exec dashboard) and restarted sqlserver. CPU came down to 5%.
could be worth checking if anyone is encountering this.
We are running a virtualized server for our FootPrints 11.1 installation. It's a quad core XEON with 8GB of RAM. Our SQL server is a physical box which is a shared resource with data stored on a SAN. All machines are running 2008R2 64 bit datacenter. All virtual hosts are running on VMWare.
We have 79 fixed agent licenses and over 30 shared license users, with an internal customr base of over 2000.
Personally, I see better performance which I use Chrome. Form design, for me, is horribly broken in IE9. But, Chrome does eventually slow down during heavy edit sessions as I suspect there is a memory leak... somewhere.
My only slow page load time is on when I open one particular workspace view with 9 widgets.
Thank you to everyone who posted tips. Although the Expand vs Tabbed tip and the Chrome tip has helped, we are still seeing the same performance numbers on average. One hope I do have is that my infrastructure manger has admitted that the virtual hardware that Footprints sits on (Citrix Xen) is extremely slow. He will soon be moving it over to a new VMWare environment. I will let you know what happens.
Boston Ad Agency