13 Replies Latest reply on Apr 13, 2011 11:36 AM by Bill Robinson

    Server security via exports and users file

      Hi all, this is an architectural question,


      the client has 2 App servers running Suse10, BL 8.0


      AP01, AP02, with Fileserver located on AP01 on a NAS head



      the client wants to lock down the app servers as much as possible to limit security breach


      they also do not want to manage users file, and adding login names everytime a new bladelogic user is added, then running ACL push jobs. We were thinking of just setting up the Exports file on the 2 app servers like this,


      AP01,AP02   rw,user=root


      this would take care of the security but this does not allow RCP console login from any other server besides the 2 app servers. Also access to the Fileserver is limited only from the 2 app servers. Controlling individual user access from Users file is not a good option either, they dont want to manage ACLs manually.


      Any ideas on how to set something like this up, securing the app servers (so users cant modify anything on App Servers via RCP Console or NSH) but also opening up the File server and RCP Console connections to external users.


      I've read the Admin guide section for this but I'm not clear how to set this up. Thanks.

        • 1. Server security via exports and users file
          Bill Robinson

          The RCP login is not controlled by the rsc files so I'm not sure I understand your comment "this would take care of the security but this does not allow RCP console login from any other server besides the 2 app servers"


          I'm not sure i understand the issue about the users file.  are they using a shared login?  or they essentially want to map everyone to root and not to any kind of authorization check on the agent side?

          • 2. Re: Server security via exports and users file
            Gerardo Bartoccini

            You can use

            BLAdmins.* rw,map=root

            On Unix’s users.local files and

            BLAdmins.* rw,map=Administrator

            On Win’s users.local files.

            This won’t need any updates, and all new BLAdmins users will inherit automatically full access to servers.


            The RCP consoles actually talks to the appservers, not to the agents (even on the appservers hosts) so they shouldn’t be affected by the RSCD security files.


            Please clarify your use case better:

            How many roles? Which level of access to servers for each role?

            • 3. Server security via exports and users file

              the client has Fileserver on same box as AP01 appserver, and because of this, they are forced keep their Exports file open to everyone, meaning anyone has r/w access to the App servers.


              what the client is concerned about is that because AP01 is open, users can go in and run NSH commands or file deploy jobs on the actuall App servers (AP01,AP02) while logged in through RCP console on some other Terminal server. They are wondering if theres a way to limit access to the app servers but still keep access to teh Fileserver open for everyone. They dont want anyone touching the Appservers but still being able to have access to Fileserver.


              I know theres a 2 RSCD agent setup (on 2 separate IPs), but that looks pretty complex, wondering if theres an easier way to manage this.




              thanks for the suggestion


              so on our 2 app servers (including Fileserver), it will look like this,



              *   rw, user=root  //because of fileserver we need to keep Exports open to all servers




              // nothing here




              BLAdmins:*  rw,map=root  //any BLAdmin user can





              if a non-BLAdmin user tries to add any of the 2 App servers to their Server folder in the Console or run NSH command on these 2 app servers, they wont be able to. But if they want to deploy a package or run a job on some other target server, they can still access the Fileserver.


              does this sound correct? Thanks.

              • 4. Server security via exports and users file
                Bill Robinson

                you do not need to keep exports open the all users on the app/file servers.  you can restrict the access on those server just like you do on the other boxes.  the rcp does not talk directly to the agent, ever.

                • 5. Server security via exports and users file
                  Bret Roemhild

                  Bill is right. RCP never talks to agents.

                  But do not leave your exports file like the way you suggested above by using the '*' or it will be wide open to all hosts...


                  Change exports from:

                  *   rw, user=root



                  appservername1 rw,user=root

                  appservername2 rw, user=root


                  This way only appserver1 & 2 can talk to the File server agent. Any other host that attempts to connect will get 'no authorization to access host'. In addition, file server mapping does not need to be open to all hosts. The only servers that need to talk to the fileserver are the appserver.

                  Bill, I have never done it yet but could managed servers need to access to the file server it you do patch deployment and use 'agent mount payload ...' option and your file server is also the patch repo?

                  • 6. Re: Server security via exports and users file
                    Bill Robinson

                    APPSERVER rw,user=root also works… which is how all the other servers will be.  the root= should also work.


                    Agent mount at payload uses nfs or cifs which are not controlled by the agent acls.

                    • 7. Re: Server security via exports and users file

                      I would also advise to move the file server off of the appserver as a best practice. Otherwise the ACL’s you push to the “fileserver” my cause the appserver not to start.

                      • 8. Server security via exports and users file

                        Thanks everyone for suggestions, it looks like the scenario works as follows


                        on teh App Servers I modified the exports file tobe like this



                        AP01, AP02     rw,user=root




                        BLAdmins:BLAdmin     rw,map=root

                        System:System     rw,map=root



                        this prevents non-BLAdmin users from browsing the app servers and running jobs on app servers. BLAdmins can browse and modify app servers, as intended.

                        • 9. Re: Server security via exports and users file
                          Bill Robinson

                          What stops users from running jobs against the appserver is the permissions granted to the role in the ui.  You should still re-consider using RBAC for its intended purpose. Maintaining RBAC is not that onerous and provides significant security benefit.  You are now dropping anyone that needs server access into one role which may or may not be ideal.  Should all users be able to manage all boxes in the environment?  That is likely to happen w/ this setup.

                          • 10. Server security via exports and users file

                            Bill, from our testing it looks like non BLAdmin users are able to have access to non-app servers, if a non BLAdmin user tries browsing the app servers, they get a read-only.


                            also 2 things that we noticed from testing this setup so far,


                            1. We have a NAS-share that acts as the Fileserver for both App servers. I wasnt aware of this, but when the RSCD agent reads the NAS, it views it as a separate IP, so in the agent logs, its showing that its reading the NAS as


                            when we configured the Exports file, we took out the * and added individual app servers to root,


                            AP01,AP02  rw,user=root


                            we could not start up the app servers after this setup. The reason is that when startign the app server, its looking to access the Fileserver, which isnt local on AP01 or AP02, its on a separate NAS. We had to go back and add the following,


                            AP01,AP02,  rw,user=root


                            this starts up the appservers.


                            #2  I'm not sure if this is intended functionality, when doing a Live Browse on 1 of our App servers, it hangs indefinitely.


                            We suspect it has to do with Server Config. We designated our AP01 server to be Authentication and Config server, while AP02 is a Job server. When doing a live browse on AP02, no problem, comes up real quick. Browsing AP01 causes a hang, almost seems like its in a loop.


                            Not sure why. Our users.local on AP01 looks ok, but for some reason if a server is designated as Authentication server, it doesnt like to be browsed.

                            • 11. Re: Server security via exports and users file

                              Mike, does the appserver point to localhost as the fileserver? That could be why it tries to come across that interface.

                              • 12. Server security via exports and users file

                                yup, exactly, the app server is configured with Fileserver as localhost. Thats why I coudlnt figure out why the service wouldnt start after the Exports change.

                                • 13. Server security via exports and users file
                                  Bill Robinson

                                  Browsing of a server has nothing to do w/ the appserver configuration.  The agent is a separate mechanism from the appserver.


                                  the nas share is not acting as a file server.  the 'file server' is whatever agent is sitting in front of your storage.  it really doesn't matter where the actual files are stored, as long as there is an agent infront of them. 


                                  it looks like what is happening here is that you configured the file server to be 'localhost' or, because the appserver is talking to itself for the file server, it's using the localhost interface (as adam notes).  so when it comes up it's coming from localhost, and the exports file is blocking that.  adding '' to exports should allow access.


                                  the live browse is another issue. app01 is trying to connect to itself on 4750 to do the live browse.  is there anything in the appserver or agent log when you do this?