<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>BMC Communities: Message List - LDAP-DB Sync Considerations - 2 CMS Consoles - 1 Database</title>
    <link>http://communities.bmc.com/communities/community/bmcdn/bmc_service_automation/client_configuration_automation?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 2.5.15 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-11T17:24:02Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LDAP-DB Sync Considerations - 2 CMS Consoles - 1 Database</title>
      <link>http://communities.bmc.com/communities/message/96969?tstart=0#96969</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:7812d0f7-99c2-46a5-87bd-42ef97764e08] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jake -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the quick reply.&amp;#160; We're using ADAM for LDAP, I don't think auto-discovery is not an option when using ADAM. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for Patch Manager, yes, we'd be using Patch Manager (shared between both consoles) to patch. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for ACL's, didn't really think about it too much, as I'm not sure it solves our issue.&amp;#160; Here is our issue:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In our current console (which manages all ADAM objects - users, workstations, servers), we have policies set against users as well as machines.&amp;#160; We have seen in testing that packages designed to run only on workstations will install on servers, if logged in with an ID which has packages assiciated to it.&amp;#160; We want to completely eliminate the possibility of any workstation packages from running on our servers, for obvious reasons, which is what drove us to look at creating a seperate console.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is what the environment looks like, both current and proposed:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Current:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Single ADAM instance (replication between Active Directory and ADAM - users, workstations and servers)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Single CMS Console&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Single Inventory DB&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Proposed:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Two ADAM instances&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;One for users, workstations and specific workstations groups&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;One for servers ONLY&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Two CMS Consoles&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;One for users, workstations and specific workstations groups&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;One for servers ONLY&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Single Inventory DB&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We also have a single master transmitter environment (multiple mirrors) behind a load balancer, which also would not change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your input, Jake!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vincent&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:7812d0f7-99c2-46a5-87bd-42ef97764e08] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>forums@developer.bmc.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.bmc.com/communities/message/96969?tstart=0#96969</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-11T17:24:02Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>6 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LDAP-DB Sync Considerations - 2 CMS Consoles - 1 Database</title>
      <link>http://communities.bmc.com/communities/message/96966?tstart=0#96966</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:37684b46-ec28-40bd-bb53-6feaf894f96e] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;Will u be using auto discovery?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Will u be using patch mgt?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If yes to any of those have you considered using one cms with ACLs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:37684b46-ec28-40bd-bb53-6feaf894f96e] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jake_morgan@bmc.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.bmc.com/communities/message/96966?tstart=0#96966</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-11T16:57:48Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>6 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LDAP-DB Sync Considerations - 2 CMS Consoles - 1 Database</title>
      <link>http://communities.bmc.com/communities/message/96965?tstart=0#96965</link>
      <description>&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyStart:8d75807c-2542-42d5-bb5b-fa7aa160c5d3] --&gt;&lt;div class='jive-rendered-content'&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are evaluating the possibility of implementing a second CMS Console to manage servers exclusively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question is, will having two different LDAP-DB sync's with one Inventory DB affect the LDAP data stored in the Inventory DB?&amp;#160; Meaning, if we sync data from LDAP 1 to the DB, will that data be deleted or affected in any way when data is sync'd from LDAP 2?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="min-height: 8pt; height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vincent&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- [DocumentBodyEnd:8d75807c-2542-42d5-bb5b-fa7aa160c5d3] --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>forums@developer.bmc.com</author>
      <guid>http://communities.bmc.com/communities/message/96965?tstart=0#96965</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-11T16:43:44Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>6 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

